Page 127 - Bodhayanti Parasparam Vol 4

REVERED LALAJI MAHARAJ – THE ADVENT
always write their name in their writings lest their insignificant self is forgotten. If the last makutam of Vemana satakam is removed then I liked it most because even otherwise Vemana satakam is sensible. Viswadabhirama vinura Vema, we need have one Abhirama nor create one Abhirama. They have created one, he is supposed to be an associate of Vemana, this is a fiction. We don‘t require that. The last line is not required at all. The first three are sufficient. What does it matter who gave it? If it is not Vemana it could be some other, what does it matter. Similarly Vedas will be Vedas even otherwise. If we all know that these things have been collected, compiled much later; to tell that this particular version is right, that particular version is wrong is not correct. When they say it is Apourusheya, it means where ever it is, it is true, it is not limited to a person. These are correct not because of the alleged origin but because it is the valid experience of the person and you are to see whether it is relevant to you.
TAM – Discovery of Revered Lalaji Maharaj: What a very beautiful way of bringing that
119